Research Progress in Multimodal Guidance for Brain Tumor Surgeryand Preservation of Functional Brain Networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71321/1wsxr932Keywords:
Brain tumor, Multimodal techniques, Functional brain networks, NeuroprotectionAbstract
The evolution of brain tumor surgery has progressed from "microsurgery" to "precision neurosurgery," currently entering a new stage characterized by the deep integration of multimodal technologies and the concept of preserving functional brain networks. This article systematically reviews the current state of research on preserving brain functional networks during brain tumor surgery. It summarizes the composition of brain functional networks, the impact of brain tumors on these networks, the classification of multimodal technologies, and the application progress of protecting key functional networks during brain tumor surgery. It emphasizes that precision surgical strategies based on preserving brain functional networks can significantly improve patient quality of life and provide a new paradigm for translational brain science research. Despite progress, key challenges remain, including interindividual functional variability, intraoperative brain shift, and the limited reproducibility of non-traditional network mapping. Future research should focus on dynamic monitoring of functional networks, long-term functional prognosis correlation analysis, and cross-modal data fusion integrated with artificial intelligence to establish new precision surgery standards guided by multimodal functional network preservation.
References
[1] DADARIO N B, SUGHRUE M E. Should Neurosurgeons Try to Preserve Non-Traditional Brain Networks? A Systematic Review of the Neuroscientific Evidence [J]. Journal of personalized medicine, 2022, 12(4).https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12040587.
[2] FOTIADIS P, PARKES L, DAVIS K A, et al. Structure-function coupling in macroscale human brain networks [J]. Nature reviews Neuroscience, 2024, 25(10):688-704.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-024-00846-6.
[3] KHALIGHI S, REDDY K, MIDYA A, et al. Artificial intelligence in neuro-oncology:advances and challenges in brain tumor diagnosis, prognosis, and precision treatment [J]. NPJ precision oncology, 2024, 8(1):80.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-024-00575-0.
[4] ZEINELDIN R A, KARAR M E, BURGERT O, et al. NeuroIGN:Explainable Multimodal Image-Guided System for Precise Brain Tumor Surgery [J]. Journal of medical systems, 2024, 48(1):25.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02037-3.
[5] QIN J, XU D, ZHANG H, et al. BTSegDiff:Brain tumor segmentation based on multimodal MRI Dynamically guided diffusion probability model [J]. Computers in biology and medicine, 2025, 186:109694.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109694.
[6] SALVALAGGIO A, PINI L, BERTOLDO A, et al. Glioblastoma and brain connectivity:the need for a paradigm shift [J]. The Lancet Neurology, 2024, 23(7):740-8.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00160-1.
[7] MAGNANI M, RUSTICI A, ZOLI M, et al. Connectome-Based Neurosurgery in Primary Intra-Axial Neoplasms:Beyond the Traditional Modular Conception of Brain Architecture for the Preservation of Major Neurological Domains and Higher-Order Cognitive Functions [J]. Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024, 14(1).https://doi.org/10.3390/life14010136.
[8] VAN DEN HEUVEL M P, HULSHOFF POL H E. Exploring the brain network:a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity [J]. European neuropsychopharmacology :the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2010, 20(8):519-34.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.008.
[9] YAO Z, HU B, XIE Y, et al. A review of structural and functional brain networks:small world and atlas [J]. Brain informatics, 2015, 2(1):45-52.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40708-015-0009-z.
[10] PARK H-J, FRISTON K. Structural and Functional Brain Networks:From Connections to Cognition [J]. 2013, 342(6158):1238411.doi:10.1126/science.1238411.
[11] PANG J C, AQUINO K M, OLDEHINKEL M, et al. Geometric constraints on human brain function [J]. Nature, 2023, 618(7965):566-74.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06098-1.
[12] LIAO X, VASILAKOS A V, HE Y. Small-world human brain networks:Perspectives and challenges [J]. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2017, 77:286-300.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.018.
[13] PARK H J, FRISTON K. Structural and functional brain networks:from connections to cognition [J]. Science (New York, NY), 2013, 342(6158):1238411.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238411.
[14] BISWAL B B, UDDIN L Q. The history and future of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Nature, 2025, 641(8065):1121-31.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08953-9.
[15] LAKHANI D A, SABSEVITZ D S, CHAICHANA K L, et al. Current State of Functional MRI in the Presurgical Planning of Brain Tumors [J]. Radiology Imaging cancer, 2023, 5(6):e230078.https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.230078.
[16] GAO W. A hierarchical model of early brain functional network development [J]. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2025, 29(9):855-68.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2025.04.001.
[17] KULKARNI S, BASSETT D S. Toward Principles of Brain Network Organization and Function [J]. Annual review of biophysics, 2025, 54(1):353-78.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-030722-110624.
[18] VAN ES M W J, HIGGINS C, GOHIL C, et al. Large-scale cortical functional networks are organized in structured cycles [J]. Nature neuroscience, 2025, 28(10):2118-28.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-02052-8.
[19] YEO B T, KRIENEN F M, SEPULCRE J, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity [J]. Journal of neurophysiology, 2011, 106(3):1125-65.https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00338.2011.
[20] POWER J D, COHEN A L, NELSON S M, et al. Functional network organization of the human brain [J]. Neuron, 2011, 72(4):665-78.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.006.
[21] FOX M D, SNYDER A Z, VINCENT J L, et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(27):9673-8.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504136102.
[22] MENON V. 20 years of the default mode network: A review and synthesis. Neuron, 2023 Aug, 111(16):2469-2487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.023.
[23] FEDORENKO E, IVANOVA A A, REGEV T I. The language network as a natural kind within the broader landscape of the human brain [J]. Nature reviews Neuroscience, 2024, 25(5):289-312.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-024-00802-4.
[24] ALVES P N, FORKEL S J, CORBETTA M, et al. The subcortical and neurochemical organization of the ventral and dorsal attention networks [J]. Communications biology, 2022, 5(1):1343.https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-04281-0.
[25] YESHURUN Y, NGUYEN M, HASSON U. The default mode network:where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world [J]. Nature reviews Neuroscience, 2021, 22(3):181-92.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-00420-w.
[26] PAQUOLA C, GARBER M, FRäSSLE S, et al. The architecture of the human default mode network explored through cytoarchitecture, wiring and signal flow [J]. Nature neuroscience, 2025, 28(3):654-64.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01868-0.
[27] ELORETTE C, FUJIMOTO A, STOLL F M, et al. The neural basis of resting-state fMRI functional connectivity in fronto-limbic circuits revealed by chemogenetic manipulation [J]. Nature communications, 2024, 15(1):4669.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49140-0.
[28] VAFAII H, MANDINO F, DESROSIERS-GRéGOIRE G, et al. Multimodal measures of spontaneous brain activity reveal both common and divergent patterns of cortical functional organization [J]. Nature communications, 2024, 15(1):229.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44363-z.
[29] MESBAH R, KOENDERS M A, VAN DER WEE N J A, et al. Association Between the Fronto-Limbic Network and Cognitive and Emotional Functioning in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J]. JAMA psychiatry, 2023, 80(5):432-40.https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0131.
[30] BERTOCCI M A, AFRIYIE-AGYEMANG Y, ROZOVSKY R, et al. Altered patterns of central executive, default mode and salience network activity and connectivity are associated with current and future depression risk in two independent young adult samples [J]. Molecular psychiatry, 2023, 28(3):1046-56.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01899-8.
[31] BROWN J A, LEE A J, FERNHOFF K, et al. Functional network collapse in neurodegenerative disease [J]. Nature communications, 2025, 16(1):10273.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65156-6.
[32] SCHUMER M C, BERTOCCI M A, ASLAM H A, et al. Patterns of Neural Network Functional Connectivity Associated With Mania/Hypomania and Depression Risk in 3 Independent Young Adult Samples [J]. JAMA psychiatry, 2024, 81(2):167-77.https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.4150.
[33] LUPPI A I, SINGLETON S P, HANSEN J Y, et al. Contributions of network structure, chemoarchitecture and diagnostic categories to transitions between cognitive topographies [J]. Nature biomedical engineering, 2024, 8(9):1142-61.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-024-01242-2.
[34] MATYI M A, RADHAKRISHNAN H, OLM C A, et al. Executive dysfunction relates to salience network desegregation in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia [J]. NeuroImage Clinical, 2025, 48:103853.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103853.
[35] HART M G, ROMERO-GARCIA R, PRICE S J, et al. Global Effects of Focal Brain Tumors on Functional Complexity and Network Robustness:A Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Neurosurgery, 2019, 84(6):1201-13.https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy378.
[36] DERKS J, KULIK S D, NUMAN T, et al. Understanding Global Brain Network Alterations in Glioma Patients [J]. Brain connectivity, 2021, 11(10):865-74.https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2020.0801.
[37] FEIGL G C, RITZ R, MORAES M, et al. Resection of malignant brain tumors in eloquent cortical areas:a new multimodal approach combining 5-aminolevulinic acid and intraoperative monitoring [J]. Journal of neurosurgery, 2010, 113(2):352-7.https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.10.JNS09447.
[38] MANDAL A S, BREM S, SUCKLING J. Brain network mapping and glioma pathophysiology [J]. Brain communications, 2023, 5(2):fcad040.https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcad040.
[39] ROMERO-GARCIA R, MANDAL A S, BETHLEHEM R A I, et al. Transcriptomic and connectomic correlates of differential spatial patterning among gliomas [J]. Brain :a journal of neurology, 2023, 146(3):1200-11.https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac378.
[40] SUN Y, WANG X, ZHANG D Y, et al. Brain-wide neuronal circuit connectome of human glioblastoma [J]. Nature, 2025, 641(8061):222-31.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08634-7.
[41] DOUW L, REIJNEVELD J C, MANDAL A S. Multiscale network perspectives on glioma:from tumour biology to symptoms, survival and treatment [J]. Nature reviews Neurology, 2026, 22(2):73-89.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01171-x.
[42] WEI Y, LI C, CUI Z, et al. Structural connectome quantifies tumour invasion and predicts survival in glioblastoma patients [J]. Brain :a journal of neurology, 2023, 146(4):1714-27.https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac360.
[43] SHABO E, SARIKAYA-SEIWERT S, BORGER V, et al. Neurosurgery 4.0:A Scoping Review of Current Trends and Challenges in Specialized Smart Hospitals [J]. Cureus, 2025, 17(9):e92673.https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.92673.
[44] SUN C, ZHANG J, BU L, et al. A speech fluency brain network derived from gliomas [J]. Brain communications, 2024, 6(3):fcae153.https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae153.
[45] WU Z, HU G, CAO B, et al. Non-traditional cognitive brain network involvement in insulo-Sylvian gliomas:a case series study and clinical experience using Quicktome [J]. Chin Neurosurg J, 2023, 9(1):16.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-023-00325-4.
[46] KRISHNA S, CHOUDHURY A, KEOUGH M B, et al. Glioblastoma remodelling of human neural circuits decreases survival [J]. Nature, 2023, 617(7961):599-607.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06036-1.
[47] TAYLOR K R, BARRON T, HUI A, et al. Glioma synapses recruit mechanisms of adaptive plasticity [J]. Nature, 2023, 623(7986):366-74.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06678-1.
[48] WANG Y, WANG Y, BAO H, et al. Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of glioma-neuron interactions [J]. Cancer letters, 2025, 629:217884.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217884.
[49] EL OUADIH Y, PEREIRA B, BIAU J, et al. DTI Abnormalities Related to Glioblastoma:A Prospective Comparative Study with Metastasis and Healthy Subjects [J]. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont), 2022, 29(4):2823-34.https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29040230.
[50] MORELL A A, EICHBERG D G, SHAH A H, et al. Using machine learning to evaluate large-scale brain networks in patients with brain tumors:Traditional and non-traditional eloquent areas [J]. Neurooncol Adv, 2022, 4(1):vdac142.https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac142.
[51] MEYER J, YU K, LUNA-FIGUEROA E, et al. Glioblastoma disrupts cortical network activity at multiple spatial and temporal scales [J]. Nature communications, 2024, 15(1):4503.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48757-5.
[52] NEJO T, KRISHNA S, YAMAMICHI A, et al. Glioma-neuronal circuit remodeling induces regional immunosuppression [J]. Nature communications, 2025, 16(1):4770.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60074-z.
[53] DUFFAU H. The challenge to remove diffuse low-grade gliomas while preserving brain functions [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2012, 154(4):569-74.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1275-7.
[54] GERRITSEN J K W, KARSCHNIA P, BELLO L, et al. A comprehensive framework for glioma surgery by the PIONEER Consortium and RANO resect group, part 2:perioperative recommendations for neurological, language, functional, and quality-of-life assessment [J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2026, 27(1):e24-e32.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00532-7.
[55] YOUNG J S, LEE A T, CHANG E F. A Review of Cortical and Subcortical Stimulation Mapping for Language [J]. Neurosurgery, 2021, 89(3):331-42.https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa436.
[56] GERRITSEN J K W, KARSCHNIA P, BELLO L, et al. A comprehensive framework for glioma surgery by the PIONEER Consortium and RANO resect group, part 1:intraoperative recommendations for mapping, monitoring, and decision making [J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2026, 27(1):e11-e23.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00531-5.
[57] SAMUEL N, VETKAS A, PANCHOLI A, et al. A Network-Based Approach to Glioma Surgery:Insights from Functional Neurosurgery [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(23).https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236127.
[58] FALCó-ROGET J, CACCIOLA A, SAMBATARO F, et al. Functional and structural reorganization in brain tumors:a machine learning approach using desynchronized functional oscillations [J]. Communications biology, 2024, 7(1):419.https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06119-3.
[59] BOU DARGHAM T, WINTER S F, BATICH K, et al. Neurocognitive outcomes in patients with brain metastases:a systematic review [J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2025, 26(12):e671-e82.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00525-x.
[60] ROMERO-GARCIA R, SUCKLING J, OWEN M, et al. Memory recovery in relation to default mode network impairment and neurite density during brain tumor treatment [J]. Journal of neurosurgery, 2022, 136(2):358-68.https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.1.Jns203959.
[61] MUELLER S, WANG D, FOX M D, et al. Individual variability in functional connectivity architecture of the human brain [J]. Neuron, 2013, 77(3):586-95.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.028.
[62] CUI W, WANG Y, REN J, et al. Personalized fMRI Delineates Functional Regions Preserved within Brain Tumors [J]. Annals of neurology, 2022, 91(3):353-66.https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26303.
[63] PAIVA W S, FONOFF E T, DOS SANTOS SILVA R P, et al. Preoperative Cortical Mapping for Brain Tumor Surgery Using Navigated Transcranial Stimulation:Analysis of Accuracy [J]. Brain sciences, 2024, 14(9).https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14090867.
[64] SINHA S, KALYAL N, GALLAGHER M J, et al. Impact of Preoperative Mapping and Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery for Deep-Seated Lesions [J]. World neurosurgery, 2024, 181:e1019-e37.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.11.030.
[65] BAIG MIRZA A, VASTANI A, SUVARNA R, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative neuromonitoring and mapping techniques impact oncological and functional outcomes in supratentorial function-eloquent brain tumours:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2025, 80:103055.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103055.
[66] SMOLDERS L, DE BAENE W, GEHRING K, et al. Presurgical structural connectivity predicts postsurgical cognitive impairment in glioma patients [J]. Brain communications, 2025, 7(5):fcaf346.https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf346.
[67] YUAN B, ZHANG N, YAN J, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity predicts individual language impairment of patients with left hemispheric gliomas involving language network [J]. NeuroImage Clinical, 2019, 24:102023.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102023.
[68] AYDOGAN D B, SOUZA V H, MATSUDA R H, et al. Real-Time Tractography-Assisted Neuronavigation for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation [J]. Human brain mapping, 2025, 46(1):e70122.https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70122.
[69] MUIR M T, NOLL K, PRINSLOO S, et al. Preoperative Brain Mapping Predicts Language Outcomes After Eloquent Tumor Resection [J]. Human brain mapping, 2025, 46(15):e70340.https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70340.
[70] SOMMER B, GRUMMICH P, HAMER H, et al. Frameless stereotactic functional neuronavigation combined with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging as a strategy in highly eloquent located tumors causing epilepsy [J]. Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery, 2014, 92(1):59-67.https://doi.org/10.1159/000355216.
[71] NINATTI G, SOLLINI M, BONO B, et al. Preoperative [11C]methionine PET to personalize treatment decisions in patients with lower-grade gliomas [J]. Neuro-oncology, 2022, 24(9):1546-56.https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac040.
[72] FREY D, SCHILT S, STRACK V, et al. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the treatment outcome in patients with brain tumors in motor eloquent locations [J]. Neuro-oncology, 2014, 16(10):1365-72.https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou110.
[73] PICHT T, SCHMIDT S, BRANDT S, et al. Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery:comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation [J]. Neurosurgery, 2011, 69(3):581-8; discussion 8.https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182181b89.
[74] LEONE A, CARBONE F, SPETZGER U, et al. Preoperative mapping techniques for brain tumor surgery:a systematic review [J]. Front Oncol, 2024, 14:1481430.https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1481430.
[75] RAFFA G, QUATTROPANI M C, GERMANò A. When imaging meets neurophysiology:the value of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative neurophysiological mapping prior to brain tumor surgery [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2019, 47(6):E10.https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.9.Focus19640.
[76] PICHT T, MULARSKI S, KUEHN B, et al. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative functional diagnostics in brain tumor surgery [J]. Neurosurgery, 2009, 65(6 Suppl):93-8; discussion 8-9.https://doi.org/10.1227/01.Neu.0000348009.22750.59.
[77] INDHARTY R S, JAPARDI I, IRINA R S, et al. Comparison of direct cortical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in brain tumor surgery:systematic review and meta analyses [J]. J Neurooncol, 2023, 163(3):505-14.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04378-4.
[78] HADDAD A F, YOUNG J S, BERGER M S, et al. Preoperative Applications of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation [J]. Frontiers in neurology, 2020, 11:628903.https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.628903.
[79] MEYERS C A, BROWN P D. Role and relevance of neurocognitive assessment in clinical trials of patients with CNS tumors [J]. Journal of clinical oncology :official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2006, 24(8):1305-9.https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.04.6086.
[80] TAPHOORN M J, KLEIN M. Cognitive deficits in adult patients with brain tumours [J]. The Lancet Neurology, 2004, 3(3):159-68.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(04)00680-5.
[81] PARSONS M W, DIETRICH J. Assessment and Management of Cognitive Symptoms in Patients With Brain Tumors [J]. 2021, (41):e90-e9.https://doi.org/10.1200/edbk_320813.
[82] NASREDDINE Z S, PHILLIPS N A, BéDIRIAN V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA:a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment [J]. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2005, 53(4):695-9.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
[83] JAMMULA V, ROGERS J L, VERA E, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in neuro-oncology:A pilot study of feasibility and utility in telehealth and in-person clinical assessments [J]. Neuro-oncology practice, 2022, 9(5):429-40.https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npac038.
[84] CARR J H, SHEPHERD R B, NORDHOLM L, et al. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients [J]. Physical therapy, 1985, 65(2):175-80.https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/65.2.175.
[85] NOLL K R, ZIU M, WEINBERG J S, et al. Neurocognitive functioning in patients with glioma of the left and right temporal lobes [J]. Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016, 128(2):323-31.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2114-0.
[86] ISLAM N, HASHEM R, GAD M, et al. Accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool for detecting mild cognitive impairment:A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2023, 19(7):3235-43.https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.13040.
[87] TOMASINO B, GUARRACINO I, IUS T, et al. Continuous Real-Time Neuropsychological Testing during Resection Phase in Left and Right Prefrontal Brain Tumors [J]. Curr Oncol, 2023, 30(2):2007-20.https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020156.
[88] CARPENTIERI S C, WABER D P, POMEROY S L, et al. Neuropsychological functioning after surgery in children treated for brain tumor [J]. Neurosurgery, 2003, 52(6):1348-56; discussion 56-7.https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000064804.00766.62.
[89] TAYLOR J W, WEYER-JAMORA C, HERVEY-JUMPER S. Molecularly determining cognition in glioma:New insights as the plot thickens [J]. Neuro-oncology, 2022, 24(10):1671-2.https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac149.
[90] VAN KESSEL E, BERENDSEN S, BAUMFALK A E, et al. Tumor-related molecular determinants of neurocognitive deficits in patients with diffuse glioma [J]. Neuro-oncology, 2022, 24(10):1660-70.https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac036.
[91] WACH J, VYCHOPEN M, BASARAN A E, et al. Efficacy and safety of intraoperative MRI in glioma surgery:a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials [J]. Journal of neurosurgery, 2025, 142(5):1319-30.https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.Jns241102.
[92] SENFT C, BINK A, FRANZ K, et al. Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery:a randomised, controlled trial [J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2011, 12(11):997-1003.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70196-6.
[93] DUFFAU H. Lessons from brain mapping in surgery for low-grade glioma:insights into associations between tumour and brain plasticity [J]. The Lancet Neurology, 2005, 4(8):476-86.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(05)70140-x.
[94] KöHLERT K, JäHNE K, SAUR D, et al. Neurophysiological examination combined with functional intraoperative navigation using TMS in patients with brain tumor near the central region-a pilot study [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2019, 161(9):1853-64.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04004-1.
[95] DE WITT HAMER P C, ROBLES S G, ZWINDERMAN A H, et al. Impact of intraoperative stimulation brain mapping on glioma surgery outcome:a meta-analysis [J]. Journal of clinical oncology :official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2012, 30(20):2559-65.https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.38.4818.
[96] LOWENSTEIN P R, CASTRO M G. Pushing the Limits of Glioma Resection Using Electrophysiologic Brain Mapping [J]. 2012, 30(20):2437-40.https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.40.6959.
[97] MACDONALD D B, SKINNER S, SHILS J, et al. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring [J]. Clinical neurophysiology :official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2013, 124(12):2291-316.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.025.
[98] LI T, BAI H, WANG G, et al. Glioma localization and excision using direct electrical stimulation for language mapping during awake surgery [J]. Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2015, 9(5):1962-6.https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2359.
[99] FATEMI P, ZHANG M, MILLER K J, et al. How Intraoperative Tools and Techniques Have Changed the Approach to Brain Tumor Surgery [J]. Curr Oncol Rep, 2018, 20(11):89.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-018-0723-9.
[100] BRELL M, IBáñEZ J, CARAL L, et al. Factors influencing surgical complications of intra-axial brain tumours [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2000, 142(7):739-50.https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010070088.
[101] DUFFAU H, LOPES M, ARTHUIS F, et al. Contribution of intraoperative electrical stimulations in surgery of low grade gliomas:a comparative study between two series without (1985-96) and with (1996-2003) functional mapping in the same institution [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2005, 76(6):845-51.https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2004.048520.
[102] KAMP M A, FINK L, FORSTER M T, et al. In-patient neurosurgical tumor treatments for malignant glioma patients in Germany [J]. J Neurooncol, 2024, 170(3):527-42.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04784-2.
[103] BAYER S, MAIER A, OSTERMEIER M, et al. Intraoperative Imaging Modalities and Compensation for Brain Shift in Tumor Resection Surgery [J]. International journal of biomedical imaging, 2017, 2017:6028645.https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6028645.
[104] NARASIMHAN S, WEIS J A, LUO M, et al. Accounting for intraoperative brain shift ascribable to cavity collapse during intracranial tumor resection [J]. Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash), 2020, 7(3):031506.https://doi.org/10.1117/1.Jmi.7.3.031506.
[105] FOUNTAIN D M, BRYANT A, BARONE D G, et al. Intraoperative imaging technology to maximise extent of resection for glioma:a network meta-analysis [J]. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2021, 1(1):Cd013630.https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013630.pub2.
[106] GIUSSANI C, TREZZA A, RICCIUTI V, et al. Intraoperative MRI versus intraoperative ultrasound in pediatric brain tumor surgery:is expensive better than cheap? A review of the literature [J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2022, 38(8):1445-54.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05545-0.
[107] XIE X, SHEN C, ZHANG X, et al. Rapid intraoperative multi-molecular diagnosis of glioma with ultrasound radio frequency signals and deep learning [J]. EBioMedicine, 2023, 98:104899.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104899.
[108] FERGUSON J, HWANG S W, TATARYN Z, et al. Neuromonitoring changes in pediatric spinal deformity surgery:a single-institution experience [J]. J Neurosurg Pediatr, 2014, 13(3):247-54.https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.12.Peds13188.
[109] SAMDANI A F, BENNETT J T, AMES R J, et al. Reversible Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring Alerts in Patients Undergoing Arthrodesis for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis:What Are the Outcomes of Surgery? [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2016, 98(17):1478-83.https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.01379.
[110] KARSCHNIA P, GERRITSEN J K W, TESKE N, et al. The oncological role of resection in newly diagnosed diffuse adult-type glioma defined by the WHO 2021 classification:a Review by the RANO resect group [J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2024, 25(9):e404-e19.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00130-x.
[111] HERBET G, DUFFAU H. Revisiting the Functional Anatomy of the Human Brain:Toward a Meta-Networking Theory of Cerebral Functions [J]. Physiological reviews, 2020, 100(3):1181-228.https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00033.2019.
[112] CHOWDHURY T, SINGH G P, ZEILER F A, et al. Anesthesia for Awake Craniotomy for Brain Tumors in an Intraoperative MRI Suite:Challenges and Evidence [J]. Frontiers in oncology, 2018, 8:519.https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00519.
[113] THUET E D, WINSCHER J C, PADBERG A M, et al. Validity and reliability of intraoperative monitoring in pediatric spinal deformity surgery:a 23-year experience of 3436 surgical cases [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(20):1880-6.https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e53434.
[114] DE ZWART B, RUIS C. An update on tests used for intraoperative monitoring of cognition during awake craniotomy [J]. Acta neurochirurgica, 2024, 166(1):204.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06062-6.
[115] TOMASELLI A, LUCA A, FERINI G, et al. Cognitive Profiles and Determinants of Eligibility for Awake Surgery in Non-Dominant Hemisphere Gliomas:A Narrative Review [J]. Brain and behavior, 2025, 15(6):e70604.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70604.
[116] LANDERS M J F, BROUWERS B, WEGGELAAR A M, et al. Monitoring of Executive Functions During Awake Glioma Surgery:A Standardized Multicenter Protocol [J]. Neurosurgery practice, 2025, 6(3):e000152.https://doi.org/10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000152.
[117] MCCRACKEN D J, SCHUPPER A J, LAKOMKIN N, et al. Turning on the light for brain tumor surgery:A 5-aminolevulinic acid story [J]. Neuro-oncology, 2022, 24(Suppl 6):S52-s61.https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac191.
[118] WELLER M, VAN DEN BENT M, PREUSSER M, et al. EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood [J]. Nature reviews Clinical oncology, 2021, 18(3):170-86.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-00447-z.
[119] STUMMER W, PICHLMEIER U, MEINEL T, et al. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma:a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial [J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2006, 7(5):392-401.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70665-9.
[120] WANG X, ZUO Z, YU S, et al. Long-term clinical prognosis of patients with gliomas infiltrating corticospinal tract on DTI tractography [J]. Chinese neurosurgical journal, 2025, 11(1):26.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-025-00412-8.
[121] BEN DOR N, SIGHINOLFI G, ROSETTI V, et al. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Biomarkers to Predict Neurological Outcomes in Brain Surgery:A Systematic Review [J]. Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026, 16(1).https://doi.org/10.3390/life16010115.
[122] FRIEDRICH M, FILSS C P, LOHMANN P, et al. Structural connectome-based predictive modeling of cognitive deficits in treated glioma patients [J]. Neuro-oncology advances, 2024, 6(1):vdad151.https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad151.
[123] KAWAHIRA K, SHIMODOZONO M, OGATA A, et al. Addition of intensive repetition of facilitation exercise to multidisciplinary rehabilitation promotes motor functional recovery of the hemiplegic lower limb [J]. J Rehabil Med, 2004, 36(4):159-64.https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970410029753.
[124] DONNELLY B M, STARK K G, PERSAUD C J, et al. Optimizing post-acute care inpatient rehabilitation for patients with brain metastasis:A systematic review of functional outcomes [J]. Supportive care in cancer :official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025, 33(5):418.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09468-9.
[125] MCLARNEY M, FERGESTROM N, ZHENG J, et al. Rehabilitation after brain tumor resection:A national study of postacute care service use through insurance claims data [J]. Pm r, 2024, 16(5):441-8.https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13117.
[126] MARCINIAK C M, SLIWA J A, HEINEMANN A W, et al. Functional outcomes of persons with brain tumors after inpatient rehabilitation [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2001, 82(4):457-63.https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.21862.
[127] YUAN Y, GU Q, ZHU M, et al. Frailty-originated early rehabilitation reduces postoperative delirium in brain tumor patients:Results from a prospective randomized study [J]. Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2023, 10(8):100263.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100263.
[128] ENGELHARDT M, SCHNEIDER H, REUTHER J, et al. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with motor deficits after brain tumor resection:a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial [J]. Frontiers in oncology, 2024, 14:1368924.https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1368924.
[129] POOLOGAINDRAN A, PROFYRIS C, YOUNG I M, et al. Interventional neurorehabilitation for promoting functional recovery post-craniotomy:a proof-of-concept [J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1):3039.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06766-8.
[130] ENGELHARDT M, GRITTNER U, KRIEG S, et al. Preconditioning of the motor network with repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rnTMS) to improve oncological and functional outcome in brain tumor surgery:a study protocol for a randomized, sham-controlled, triple-blind clinical trial [J]. Trials, 2023, 24(1):638.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07640-2.
[131] EINSTEIN E H, DADARIO N B, KHILJI H, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-operative neurorehabilitation in neuro-oncology:a review of the literature and future directions [J]. J Neurooncol, 2022, 157(3):435-43.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-03987-9.
[132] MA J, RUI Z, ZOU Y, et al. Neurosurgical and BCI approaches to visual rehabilitation in occipital lobe tumor patients [J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(23):e39072.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39072.
[133] YOUNG M J, LIN D J, HOCHBERG L R. Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neurorecovery and Neurorehabilitation [J]. Seminars in neurology, 2021, 41(2):206-16.https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725137.
[134] CARINO-ESCOBAR R I, RODRIGUEZ-BARRAGAN M A, CARRILLO-MORA P, et al. Brain-computer interface as complementary therapy for hemiparesis in an astrocytoma patient [J]. Neurol Sci, 2022, 43(4):2879-81.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-05924-0.
[135] CHAUDHARY U, BIRBAUMER N, RAMOS-MURGUIALDAY A. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation [J]. Nature reviews Neurology, 2016, 12(9):513-25.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.113.
[136] WANG N, TU W J. Editorial:Brain-computer interfaces in neurological disorders:expanding horizons for diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation [J]. Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024, 18:1526723.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1526723.
[137] EKERT J O, GOYAL A, YOUNG J S, et al. Interventional neurorehabilitation for glioma patients:A systematic review [J]. Neuro-oncology practice, 2024, 11(6):679-90.https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npae066.
[138] DE ROECK L, COLAES R, DUPONT P, et al. Increased functional network segregation in glioma patients posttherapy:A neurological compensatory response or catastrophe for cognition? [J]. Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass), 2025, 9(2):743-60.https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00449.
[139] SAVIOLA F, ZIGIOTTO L, NOVELLO L, et al. The role of the default mode network in longitudinal functional brain reorganization of brain gliomas [J]. Brain structure & function, 2022, 227(9):2923-37.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02490-1.
[140] RAMíREZ-FERRER E, AGUILERA-PENA M P, DUFFAU H. Functional and oncological outcomes after right hemisphere glioma resection in awake versus asleep patients:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Neurosurgical review, 2024, 47(1):160.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02370-8.
[141] DE ROECK L, COLAES R, DUPONT P, et al. Increased functional network segregation in glioma patients posttherapy:A neurological compensatory response or catastrophe for cognition? [J]. 2025, 9(2):743-60
[142] PEROVNIK M, RUS T, SCHINDLBECK K A, et al. Functional brain networks in the evaluation of patients with neurodegenerative disorders [J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2023, 19(2):73-90.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-022-00753-3.
[143] AMORES-CARRERA L, MARTíN-MONZóN I J N-O P. Neuropsychological outcomes following awake surgery in adult glioma patients:A systematic review [J]. 2025:npaf075
[144] DUFFAU H. The huge plastic potential of adult brain and the role of connectomics:new insights provided by serial mappings in glioma surgery [J]. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2014, 58:325-37.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.005.
[145] YANG J, KUDULAITI N, CHEN Z, et al. Within and beyond the visual cortex:brain tumors induce highly sensitive plasticity of visual processing in whole-brain neural functional networks [J]. Cerebral cortex (New York, NY :1991), 2022, 32(20):4422-35.https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab492.
[146] NG S, MORITZ-GASSER S, LEMAITRE A L, et al. Multivariate mapping of low-resilient neurocognitive systems within and around low-grade gliomas [J]. Brain :a journal of neurology, 2024, 147(8):2718-31.https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae130.
[147] DUFFAU H. Brain plasticity:from pathophysiological mechanisms to therapeutic applications [J]. Journal of clinical neuroscience :official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2006, 13(9):885-97.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2005.11.045.
[148] BI W L, HOSNY A, SCHABATH M B, et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging:Clinical challenges and applications [J]. CA:a cancer journal for clinicians, 2019, 69(2):127-57.https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21552.
[149] KICKINGEREDER P, ISENSEE F, TURSUNOVA I, et al. Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks:a multicentre, retrospective study [J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2019, 20(5):728-40.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30098-1.
[150] BOERGER T F, PAHAPILL P, BUTTS A M, et al. Large-scale brain networks and intra-axial tumor surgery:a narrative review of functional mapping techniques, critical needs, and scientific opportunities [J]. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023, 17:1170419.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1170419.
Type
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Head and Neck Diseases Conflux

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.