Effects and Mechanisms of Parental Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure on Offspring Health: A Narrative Review

Xiwen Yang; Jiaming Guo; Hongli Yan

doi:10.71321/24d64c27

Authors

Xiwen Yang University of Shanghai for Science and Technology
Jiaming Guo 1. School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
Hongli Yan 1. School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71321/24d64c27

Keywords:

Electromagnetic radiation, Offspring, Nerve, Reproductive system, Exposure

Abstract

The advancement of technology has heightened concerns regarding the potential health effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure on future generations. This review aims to synthesize current research on the health impacts of parental EMR exposure on offspring, focusing on underlying biological mechanisms and providing scientific evidence to support preventive health recommendations. Studies suggest parental EMR exposure may detrimentally impact offspring's neurological and reproductive systems. Numerous animal experiments and epidemiological studies indicate associations between EMR exposure and adverse outcomes, such as fetal dysplasia, cognitive impairment, and reproductive damage. This review further examines possible mechanisms, such as oxidative stress, apoptosis, and DNA damage. Investigating the health effects of EMR on offspring is crucial for developing preventive measures and intervention strategies to reduce congenital disabilities and enhance reproductive health. Given the methodological inconsistencies and variable results in existing studies, future research should focus on refining experimental designs to assess the long-term impacts of different EMR frequencies and intensities on developing individuals, thereby clarifying their public health implications. This review seeks to consolidate findings on the effects of parental EMR exposure on offspring health, elucidate underlying mechanisms, and provide evidence-based recommendations to support public health interventions for future generations.

Author Biographies

Jiaming Guo, 1. School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China

-
Hongli Yan, 1. School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China

-

References

[1] Muhibbullah M, Haleem AMA, Ikuma Y. (2017). Frequency dependent power and energy flux density equations of the electromagnetic wave. Results in Physics.7,435-9.http://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.01.006

[2] Gautam R, Singh KV, Nirala J, Murmu NN, Meena R, Rajamani P. (2019). Oxidative stress-mediated alterations on sperm parameters in male Wistar rats exposed to 3G mobile phone radiation. Andrologia.51(3),e13201.http://https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13201

[3] Verbeek J, Oftedal G, Feychting M, van Rongen E, Rosaria Scarfì M, Mann S, et al. (2021). Prioritizing health outcomes when assessing the effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: A survey among experts. Environment International.146,106300.http://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106300

[4] Mahaldashtian M, Khalili MA, Anbari F, Seify M, Belli M. (2022). Challenges on the effect of cell phone radiation on mammalian embryos and fetuses: a review of the literature. Zygote.30(2),176-82.http://10.1017/S0967199421000691

[5] Lagorio S, Blettner M, Baaken D, Feychting M, Karipidis K, Loney T, et al. (2021). The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A protocol for a systematic review of human observational studies. Environment International.157,106828.http://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106828

[6] Keleş Aİ. (2020). Morphological changes in the vertebrae and central canal of rat pups born after exposure to the electromagnetic field of pregnant rats. Acta Histochemica.122(8),151652.http://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acthis.2020.151652

[7] Keleş Aİ, Süt BB. (2021). Histopathological and epigenetic alterations in the spinal cord due to prenatal electromagnetic field exposure: An H3K27me3-related mechanism. Toxicology and Industrial Health.37(4),189-97.http://10.1177/0748233721996947

[8] Odaci E, Bas O, Kaplan S. (2008). Effects of prenatal exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on the dentate gyrus of rats: a stereological and histopathological study. Brain Research.1238,224-9.http://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.08.013

[9] Kilic A, Ustunova S, Bulut H, Meral I. (2023). Pre and postnatal exposure to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields induce inflammation and oxidative stress, and alter renin-angiotensin system components differently in male and female offsprings. Life Sciences.321,121627.http://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121627

[10] Haghani M, Shabani M, Moazzami K. (2013). Maternal mobile phone exposure adversely affects the electrophysiological properties of Purkinje neurons in rat offspring. Neuroscience.250,588-98.http://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.049

[11] Feychting M, Ahlbom A, Kheifets L. (2005). EMF and health. Annu Rev Public Health.26,165-89.http://10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144445

[12] Blaasaas KG, Tynes T, Irgens A, Lie RT. (2002). Risk of birth defects by parental occupational exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields: a population based study. Occup Environ Med.59(2),92-7.http://10.1136/oem.59.2.92

[13] Baldi I, Coureau G, Jaffré A, Gruber A, Ducamp S, Provost D, et al. (2011). Occupational and residential exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of brain tumors in adults: a case-control study in Gironde, France. Int J Cancer.129(6),1477-84.http://10.1002/ijc.25765

[14] De Roos AJ, Teschke K, Savitz DA, Poole C, Grufferman S, Pollock BH, Olshan AF. (2001). Parental occupational exposures to electromagnetic fields and radiation and the incidence of neuroblastoma in offspring. Epidemiology.12(5),508-17.http://10.1097/00001648-200109000-00008

[15] Razavinasab M, Moazzami K, Shabani M. (2016). Maternal mobile phone exposure alters intrinsic electrophysiological properties of CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat offspring. Toxicol Ind Health.32(6),968-79.http://10.1177/0748233714525497

[16] Zhang Y, Li Z, Gao Y, Zhang C. (2015). Effects of fetal microwave radiation exposure on offspring behavior in mice. J Radiat Res.56(2),261-8.http://10.1093/jrr/rru097

[17] Birks L, Guxens M, Papadopoulou E, Alexander J, Ballester F, Estarlich M, et al. (2017). Maternal cell phone use during pregnancy and child behavioral problems in five birth cohorts. Environ Int.104,122-31.http://10.1016/j.envint.2017.03.024

[18] Kumari K, Koivisto H, Capstick M, Naarala J, Viluksela M, Tanila H, Juutilainen J. (2018). Behavioural phenotypes in mice after prenatal and early postnatal exposure to intermediate frequency magnetic fields. Environ Res.162,27-34.http://10.1016/j.envres.2017.12.013

[19] Acikgoz B, Ersoy N, Aksu I, Kiray A, Bagriyanik HA, Kiray M. (2022). Gender differences in effects of prenatal and postnatal exposure to electromagnetic field and prenatal zinc on behaviour and synaptic proteins in rats. J Chem Neuroanat.122,102092.http://10.1016/j.jchemneu.2022.102092

[20] Agarwal A, Singh A, Hamada A, Kesari K. (2011). Cell phones and male infertility: a review of recent innovations in technology and consequences. Int Braz J Urol.37(4),432-54.http://10.1590/s1677-55382011000400002

[21] Ersoy N, Acikgoz B, Aksu I, Kiray A, Bagriyanik HA, Kiray M. (2022). The Effects of Prenatal and Postnatal Exposure to 50-Hz and 3 mT Electromagnetic Field on Rat Testicular Development. Medicina (Kaunas).59(1).http://10.3390/medicina59010071

[22] Özorak A, Nazıroğlu M, Çelik Ö, Yüksel M, Özçelik D, Özkaya MO, et al. (2013). Wi-Fi (2.45 GHz)- and mobile phone (900 and 1800 MHz)-induced risks on oxidative stress and elements in kidney and testis of rats during pregnancy and the development of offspring. Biol Trace Elem Res.156(1-3),221-9.http://10.1007/s12011-013-9836-z

[23] Yan S, Ju Y, Dong J, Lei H, Wang J, Xu Q, et al. (2022). Paternal Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure Causes Sex-Specific Differences in Body Weight Trajectory and Glucose Metabolism in Offspring Mice. Front Public Health.10,872198.http://10.3389/fpubh.2022.872198

[24] Andrašková S, Holovská K, Ševčíková Z, Andrejčáková Z, Tóth Š, Martončíková M, et al. (2022). The potential adverse effect of 2.45 GHz microwave radiation on the testes of prenatally exposed peripubertal male rats. Histol Histopathol.37(3),287-99.http://10.14670/hh-18-402

[25] Ryan BM, Symanski RR, Pomeranz LE, Johnson TR, Gauger JR, McCormick DL. (1999). Multigeneration reproductive toxicity assessment of 60-Hz magnetic fields using a continuous breeding protocol in rats. Teratology.59(3),156-62.http://10.1002/(sici)1096-9926(199903)59:3<156::Aid-tera7>3.0.Co;2-b

[26] Burcu A, Nevin E, Ilkay A, Amac K, Alper BH, Muge K. (2020). The effects of prenatal and postnatal exposure to electromagnetic field on rat ovarian tissue. Toxicology and Industrial Health.36(12),1010-8.http://10.1177/0748233720973136

[27] Shirai T, Wang J, Kawabe M, Wake K, Watanabe S-i, Takahashi S, Fujiwara O. (2017). No adverse effects detected for simultaneous whole-body exposure to multiple-frequency radiofrequency electromagnetic fields for rats in the intrauterine and pre- and post-weaning periods. Journal of Radiation Research.58(1),48-58.http://10.1093/jrr/rrw085

[28] Takahashi S, Imai N, Nabae K, Wake K, Kawai H, Wang J, et al. (2009). Lack of Adverse Effects of Whole-Body Exposure to a Mobile Telecommunication Electromagnetic Field on the Rat Fetus. Radiation Research.173(3),362-72.http://10.1667/rr1615.1

[29] Baste V, Riise T, Moen BE. (2008). Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields; male infertility and sex ratio of offspring. European Journal of Epidemiology.23(5),369-77.http://10.1007/s10654-008-9236-4

[30] Mageroy N, Mollerlokken OJ, Riise T, Koefoed V, Moen BE. (2006). A higher risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring of personnel who served aboard a Norwegian missile torpedo boat. Occupational and Environmental Medicine.63(2),92.http://10.1136/oem.2005.021113

[31] Baste V, Moen BE, Oftedal G, Strand LÅ, Bjørge L, Mild KH. (2012). Pregnancy Outcomes After Paternal Radiofrequency Field Exposure Aboard Fast Patrol Boats. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.54(4),431-8.http://10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182445003

[32] Baste V, Oftedal G, Møllerløkken OJ, Hansson Mild K, Moen BE. (2015). Prospective Study of Pregnancy Outcomes After Parental Cell Phone Exposure: The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Epidemiology.26(4),613-21.http://10.1097/ede.0000000000000293

[33] Knave B, Gamberale F, BergstrÖM S, Birke E, Iregren A, Kolmodin-Hedman B, Wennberg A. (1979). Long-term exposure to electric fields: A cross-sectional epidemiologic investigation of occupationally exposed workers in high-voltage substations. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health.5(2),115-25

[34] Topal Z, Hanci H, Mercantepe T, Erol HS, Keleş ON, Kaya H, et al. (2015). The effects of prenatal long-duration exposure to 900-MHz electromagnetic field on the 21-day-old newborn male rat liver. Turk J Med Sci.45(2),291-7.http://10.3906/sag-1404-168

[35] Bozok S, Karaagac E, Sener D, Akakin D, Tumkaya L. (2022). The effects of long-term prenatal exposure to 900, 1800, and 2100 MHz electromagnetic field radiation on myocardial tissue of rats. Toxicology and Industrial Health.39(1),1-9.http://10.1177/07482337221139586

[36] Bahreyni Toossi MH, Reza SH, Maryam MMF, Mahmoud H, Mahdiyeh H, Razieh M, et al. (2018). Exposure to mobile phone (900–1800 MHz) during pregnancy: tissue oxidative stress after childbirth. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine.31(10),1298-303.http://10.1080/14767058.2017.1315657

[37] Guleken Z, Sarıbal D, Uyulan C, Keles A, Depciuch J. (2021). Investigating Bio-interface Effects of Chronic ELF-MF Exposure before and after Neonatal Life on Rat Offspring Using Spectroscopy and Biochemical Assays. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry.12(1),795 - 808.https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC121.795808

[38] Çiftçi ZZ, Kırzıoğlu Z, Nazıroğlu M, Özmen Ö. (2015). Effects of Prenatal and Postnatal Exposure of Wi-Fi on Development of Teeth and Changes in Teeth Element Concentration in Rats. Biological Trace Element Research.163(1),193-201.http://10.1007/s12011-014-0175-5

[39] Özorak A, Nazıroğlu M, Çelik Ö, Yüksel M, Özçelik D, Özkaya MO, et al. (2013). Wi-Fi (2.45 GHz)- and Mobile Phone (900 and 1800 MHz)-Induced Risks on Oxidative Stress and Elements in Kidney and Testis of Rats During Pregnancy and the Development of Offspring. Biological Trace Element Research.156(1),221-9.http://10.1007/s12011-013-9836-z

[40] Lary JM, Conover DL, Johnson PH, Burg JR. (1983). Teratogenicity of 27.12-MHz radiation in rats is related to duration of hyperthermic exposure. Bioelectromagnetics.4(3),249-55.https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.2250040305

[41] GÜLER ÖZTÜRK G, Tomruk A, Ozgur E, Seyhan N. (2010). The effect of radiofrequency radiation on DNA and lipid damage in non-pregnant and pregnant rabbits and their newborns. General physiology and biophysics.29(1).https://10.4149/gpb_2010_01_59

[42] Pearce MS, Hammal DM, Dorak MT, McNally RJQ, Parker L. (2007). Paternal occupational exposure to electro-magnetic fields as a risk factor for cancer in children and young adults: A case-control study from the North of England. Pediatric Blood & Cancer.49(3),280-6.https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.21021

[43] Reid A, Glass DC, Bailey HD, Milne E, de Klerk NH, Downie P, et al. (2011). Risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia following parental occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. British Journal of Cancer.105(9),1409-13.http://10.1038/bjc.2011.365

[44] Bohacek J, Mansuy IM. (2015). Molecular insights into transgenerational non-genetic inheritance of acquired behaviours. Nature Reviews Genetics.16(11),641-52.http://10.1038/nrg3964

[45] Cavalli G, Heard E. (2019). Advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease. Nature.571(7766),489-99.http://10.1038/s41586-019-1411-0

[46] Nagano T, Lubling Y, Stevens TJ, Schoenfelder S, Yaffe E, Dean W, et al. (2013). Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature.502(7469),59-64.http://10.1038/nature12593